Rev. Obofour curses TikToker Dandale over GH₵2,000 allegations

Rev. Obofour, the founder and leader of the Anointed Palace Chapel (APC), has sparked significant social media conversation after releasing a video where he invoked curses on a TikTok user identified as Dandale. The religious leader's public outburst was directly triggered by specific allegations involving a sum of GH 2,000 that the social media influencer made against him. The incident has once again brought the clergyman's confrontational style of addressing critics into the limelight.

In the video shared across various social media platforms, a visibly agitated Rev. Obofour addressed the claims directly, dismissing them as malicious and unfounded. Expressing deep-seated anger, he utilized strong language to rain curses on Dandale, asserting that the accusations were a deliberate attempt to defame his character and ministry. This reaction follows a pattern of the APC founder using his digital presence to respond aggressively to individuals he perceives as detractors or those spreading falsehoods about his personal and professional life.

The dispute centers on claims regarding GH 2,000, although the precise context of the alleged financial transaction or interaction remains a point of contention among followers. While the clergyman did not provide an alternative narrative for the money in question, his primary focus remained on the spiritual repercussions he wished upon his accuser. The public nature of the confrontation has divided opinion online, with some followers supporting his stance while others express concern over the use of spiritual threats in a financial dispute.

This latest development highlights the ongoing friction between Ghana’s established religious figures and the rising influence of TikTok content creators who often use their platforms to challenge or expose public figures. As social media continues to provide a direct line of communication between religious leaders and the public, the fallout from this specific confrontation is expected to generate further debate regarding the accountability of influencers and the conduct of prominent clergy members in the digital age.