••
Bishop Daniel Obinim, the founder and leader of the International God’s Way Church, has publicly addressed recent reports regarding his ongoing marital separation from gospel musician Florence Obinim. The controversy stems from claims that Florence does not intend to seek financial compensation or property settlements should their marriage be formally dissolved. In a swift response, the preacher detailed the significant financial and material support he currently provides, highlighting a monthly allowance and substantial real estate assets already in her possession.
The narrative began with reports suggesting that Florence Obinim had adopted a stoic stance toward the potential end of their union. According to these accounts, originally circulated by GHPage, the gospel singer indicated she would forgo any legal or traditional demands for alimony or a share of the Bishop's wealth in the event of an official divorce. This posture of independence sparked widespread discussion across social media, with many followers interpreting it as a move to distance herself from the preacher's assets.
However, Bishop Obinim challenged the perception that Florence would be leaving the marriage empty-handed or without his support. He revealed that he has already gifted her a four-storey hostel, a significant asset likely intended for commercial use or rental income. Furthermore, the Bishop disclosed that he currently provides her with a monthly allowance of GH¢20,000 to ensure her standard of living is maintained during their estrangement. His reaction suggests a desire to clarify that he has fulfilled his responsibilities as a husband and provider throughout their union and into its current phase.
This public exchange marks the latest chapter in the high-profile separation of one of Ghana’s most visible couples. As both figures command significant influence—Obinim within the charismatic Christian community and Florence within the gospel music industry—the details of their personal lives continue to draw intense public interest. While the legal status of their divorce remains a subject of speculation, the public back-and-forth over assets and allowances provides a glimpse into the complexities of their transitioning relationship and the personal stakes involved in maintaining their public personas.