
Ghanaian-American filmmaker Leila Jewel Djansi has sparked a significant public conversation regarding the investment priorities of wealthy African religious institutions. In a poignant social media critique, Djansi questioned why many affluent churches concentrate their financial resources on constructing lavish chapels rather than establishing essential infrastructure such as hospitals, schools, and scientific research facilities. Her comments highlight a perceived disconnect between the spiritual message of healing preached within these walls and the practical reality of healthcare-seeking behavior among the continent’s elite.
Djansi’s critique specifically addresses the irony of "casting and binding" the spiritual influences of foreign nations while simultaneously relying on those same nations for advanced medical care. She noted that while many religious leaders and wealthy congregants advocate for prayer as a primary solution to illness, they frequently travel to countries like India or Western nations when faced with serious health challenges. Referencing the case of the late TB Joshua, Djansi emphasized that the reliance on foreign medical expertise underscores a failure within local institutions to provide the very care they claim to facilitate through divine intervention.
Furthermore, the filmmaker drew a sharp contrast between the modern charismatic movement and established denominations like the Catholic and Adventist churches, which have a long history of building schools and hospitals that serve the general public. She urged contemporary African church founders to pivot their focus toward projects that offer enduring community benefits. According to Djansi, the vast funds collected through tithes and donations should be channeled into training facilities and medical centers that would remain functional and beneficial to the populace long after the individual church founders have passed away.
By calling for a shift from "transient projects" to sustainable development, Djansi’s message serves as a broader challenge to religious philanthropy across Africa. Her perspective suggests that for the church to remain a relevant and life-saving force in society, it must supplement its spiritual mandate with tangible, actionable contributions to the continent's healthcare and educational systems. The discussion she has ignited underscores an urgent need for institutional accountability and a reassessment of how religious wealth can best serve the pressing physical needs of the African people.